2011年5月30日 · And the flight review requirement is biennial (every two years), not bi-annual (twice a year). The FAA dropped "biennial" from the title quite a while back, probably because of the semantic confusion, but folks still call them BFR's just like they still …

2020年5月20日 · From 61.56: "Flight Review", which lists things that reset the clock, including: (d) (2) A practical test conducted by an examiner for the issuance of a flight instructor certificate, an additional rating on a flight instructor certificate, renewal of a flight instructor certificate, or reinstatement of a flight instructor certificate.

2015年2月4日 · Specifically, you have asked for clarification regarding the time requirements for a biennial flight review in 14 C.F.R. § 61.56(c). *** Based on the facts that you have presented, a biennial flight review accomplished on April 2, 2002, would not lapse until May 1, 2004.

2011年7月31日 · - and best of all, after 2 years since the checkride, even if my hours flown were so few, I really did not have a problem with the flight portion at all. - and throughout the entire flight review, both ground and flight, the "demeanor" is different from that of a checkride, it is more "between pilots"-sort of thing (if that makes sense).

2008年7月8日 · The FSDO may say it's OK, but the CFI doesn't have to agree or participate. Personally, I'm not giving you a BFR sign-off unless I give the ground and flight. Edit: nevermind, I mis-read (or mis-understood) your post. You're the one GIVING the flight review. Carry on.

2008年6月15日 · There are certain required elements of the ground training portion of a flight review which would not be part of a typical TW endorsement, particularly the "review of the current general operating and flight rules of part 91 of this chapter." This must be documented as ground training IAW 61.51, including specific language describing the topics ...

2020年10月3日 · At least they were never anything other the Biennial. The FAA put the annual flight review in when the Recreational pilot certificate was created for purely political reasons (to appease the flight instructor lobby who were bawling all over the place that reducing the pilot certification requirements was going to cost them their livelihoods).

2016年12月9日 · Actually it's not "required every two years," which is why I said it was never really a biennial flight review to begin with. Leaving aside the "calendar month" thing, a flight review is required within 2 years before you act as pilot in command. You need to renew your drivers license every X years or you no longer have one.

2006年5月25日 · When the individual taking a flight instructor practical test requests that the test be taken in conjunction with a biennial flight review, the activities related to the flight instructor practical test may be evaluated by the examiner for demonstrating the maneuvers and procedures necessary to accomplish a flight review. ....

2005年2月12日 · The ASA guide is not consistent with the FAA's interpretations of 14 CFR 61.51. It doesn't matter whether the reviewee is current or not -- since the reviewee must be "rated" (has the appropriate category and class ratings on his/her pilot certificate) in the aircraft in which the pilot takes the flight review (see 14 CFR 61.57(c)(1)), the reviewee logs the time in the PIC column under the ...